The Foreign Affairs subcommittee hearing featuring testimony from Donald Lu has sparked mixed reactions from US-based experts, reflecting diverse perspectives on US-Pakistan relations and related issues.
Supporters of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) expressed dissatisfaction with Lu’s rejection of certain charges, viewing it as a tacit acknowledgment of a regime change threat. However, others, like Pakistani-American scholar Shuja Nawaz, saw Lu’s dismissal of the PTI conspiracy narrative as a reflection of poor decision-making within the Pakistani government.
Also Read: Donald Lu Vows to Offer Insights on Pakistan’s ‘Election Irregularities,’ Outlines US Policy
Nawaz emphasized the significance of the hearing in highlighting Pakistan’s reliance on US support and trade dependence, particularly in the context of the recent IMF staff agreement for potential financial relief. He also noted the importance of addressing allegations of election irregularities to avoid future US sanctions.
Uzair Younus, another scholar, observed a departure from past hearings, with a focus on a bilateral relationship based on its own merits rather than criticism related to Afghanistan. He highlighted critical issues raised during the hearing, including the Iran gas pipeline, terrorism in Pakistan, and Chinese lending’s role in the economic crisis.
Michael Kugelman, however, viewed the testimony as routine, providing insights into US policy toward Pakistan without significant implications for broader US policy. He noted the crowded attendance but suggested the hearing lacked substantial importance beyond its immediate topic.
Additionally, Lu mentioned US collaboration with India regarding a foiled plot to kill Sikh Gurpatwant Singh Pannun on American soil, emphasizing the seriousness of the issue and the administration’s efforts to hold accountable those involved.
Overall, the hearing underscored varying perspectives on US-Pakistan relations and the complex dynamics shaping them, including concerns over election irregularities, economic challenges, and regional security issues.
