Renowned Islamic scholar Dr. Zakir Naik has ignited a debate on the relationship between women’s clothing and harassment following his recent remarks suggesting that modest dressing can help prevent such incidents. In a video shared on X, Dr. Naik argued that women who wear bold, un-Islamic attire are more susceptible to harassment, citing the importance of the hijab.
He illustrated his point with an example of two sisters—one dressed in a hijab and the other in a miniskirt—asking his audience to consider who would be more likely to face harassment in public spaces like New York or Sokoto.
Read more: Religious Scholar Dr. Zakir Naik Arrives in Pakistan for 15-Day Visit
While Dr. Naik’s assertion resonated with some, many criticized the notion, pointing out the increasing number of harassment incidents involving women wearing hijab. Reports from various regions, including Pakistan, have highlighted troubling cases of harassment and abuse in madrassahs, indicating that clothing alone cannot shield women from such acts.
Critics argue that Dr. Naik’s comments reflect a troubling tendency to blame victims rather than addressing the deeper societal issues at play. The belief that modest clothing equates to safety has been challenged by numerous cases, including instances of sexual assault in religious schools, further emphasizing that harassment is a complex problem not solved by mere changes in attire.
Advocates for women’s rights are calling for a shift in focus towards educating society about consent and respect, rather than imposing restrictions on women’s clothing. They argue that the conversation should prioritize accountability for perpetrators rather than perpetuating victim-blaming narratives.
As the discussion continues, it is clear that the relationship between women’s clothing and harassment is far more intricate than simplistic solutions suggest. Addressing this issue requires a comprehensive approach that acknowledges the multifaceted nature of harassment and prioritizes women’s safety and dignity.
