Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the world of work at a pace few could have predicted. Yet, according to Bloomberg columnist Adrian Wooldridge, the most pressing question isn’t technological but organizational: Will companies use AI to empower workers or to tighten managerial control? The answer, he argues, could define the future of business creativity, productivity, and even workplace freedom.
The Rise of the Digital Panopticon
Wooldridge warns that most organizations are likely to use AI to strengthen hierarchy rather than promote collaboration. He draws a chilling parallel between today’s AI-driven workplaces and Jeremy Bentham’s 18th-century concept of the panopticon—a prison where inmates could be watched at all times by unseen guards. In the modern version, AI serves as the all-seeing warden, tracking every keystroke, movement, and even emotion of employees.
This system of control, known as digital Taylorism, takes Frederick Taylor’s early 20th-century principles of standardization and measurement to new extremes. Tech giants like Amazon and Uber are leading examples of this approach. Their algorithmic management systems monitor workers’ productivity minute by minute, rewarding speed and efficiency while punishing pauses or perceived inefficiency. Amazon warehouse workers, for instance, have reported relentless pressure and invasive monitoring—even bathroom breaks are timed.
The Human Cost of Algorithmic Control
While such systems may appear to increase productivity, Wooldridge argues they come at a steep cost to human motivation and creativity. Studies consistently show that employees value autonomy, community, and purpose more than pay alone. Overly controlled environments destroy these values, leading to disengagement and burnout. A 2024 review of 172 studies on algorithm-driven management found that workers felt deeply frustrated by the lack of transparency—algorithms know everything about them, yet they know nothing about how they are judged.
Even professional sectors are not immune. Financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase have begun using AI to write performance reviews, further eroding human judgment and empathy in management. This shift threatens not only morale but also long-term innovation, as creative workers often leave rigid organizations for more empowering environments.
The Alternative: Human-Centric AI
Wooldridge suggests a different path—using AI to liberate rather than monitor. Human-centric organizations could use AI to automate repetitive tasks, giving workers more time for creativity and collaboration. AI can also enable decentralized teamwork, allowing employees to set collective goals and manage projects with greater independence. Such empowerment would likely lead to higher engagement, stronger innovation, and healthier corporate cultures.
However, he cautions that the temptation to chase “low-hanging fruit” — layoffs, tighter surveillance, and performance metrics — is too great for many executives to resist. The result could be a self-reinforcing cycle: as machines take over decision-making, human initiative atrophies, creating even more reliance on machines.
The Future of Work: Empowerment or Entrapment?
As companies race to adopt AI tools, the choices they make today will shape the workplaces of tomorrow. If businesses continue to treat AI as a tool for control, the result may be a generation of alienated workers trapped in digital cages. But if leaders reimagine AI as a partner in creativity and growth, it could usher in a new era of meaningful, human-centered work.
Wooldridge’s warning is clear: AI will not just change how we work—it will change who holds the power in the workplace. The question now is whether leaders will use that power to liberate their people or to watch them more closely than ever before.
In other news also read about How Three 22-Year-Olds Just Beat Zuckerberg; Rise of the World’s Youngest AI Billionaires
