The decision made by Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly to halt arms exports to Israel, along with the subsequent passage of a non-binding motion by the Canadian parliament, has sparked both praise and criticism. The motion, which aims to cease the further authorization and transfer of arms exports to Israel, comes after significant pressure from the Palestine solidarity movement.
While Canadian officials have defended the decision as a step towards justice for the Palestinian people, Israeli officials have condemned it, warning of potential consequences. Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz expressed strong disapproval, suggesting that history will judge Canada’s action harshly.
Also Read: Pakistan Raises Concerns on ‘Target Killings’ with US and Canada
The Palestine solidarity movement, however, sees the motion as a significant achievement resulting from consistent grassroots mobilization and campaigning. Despite this success, activists have pointed out several limitations and caveats to the motion. These include Canada’s continued ability to purchase weapons from Israel, no increase in temporary visa applications for those fleeing Gaza, no sanctions on Israeli leaders inciting genocide, and no official recognition of the Palestinian state.
The original motion proposed by the New Democratic Party included additional provisions, such as official recognition of the State of Palestine and suspension of all trade in military goods and technology with Israel. However, these provisions were not included in the final motion passed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party.
Palestine solidarity activists are now urging Canadian officials to fully enforce the motion, particularly by revoking all export permits for arms sales to Israel, even those approved before the motion’s enactment. They argue that immediate action is necessary to ensure that Canada’s commitment to halting arms exports to Israel is upheld.
