The Lahore High Court has issued an important ruling on government employees’ pension benefits.

The court ruled that contractual service can count toward pension after regularisation. This decision could benefit employees who served temporarily before gaining permanent status.

The ruling clarifies the Pension Rights of government workers with long periods of contractual service. Their initial service cannot automatically be excluded from pension calculations.

A two-member bench heard the case. Justice Muzammil Akhtar Shabbir led the bench with Justice Syed Ahsan Raza Kazmi.

The bench dismissed an intra-court appeal filed by the Punjab government. It also upheld an earlier decision in favour of the employee’s family.

The case involved the widow of a deceased Health Department employee. She had approached the court seeking pension and gratuity after her husband’s death.

The District Accounts Office Khanewal had raised an objection to the pension claim. Officials had counted the employee’s qualifying service as less than 10 years.

The accounts office therefore created a hurdle in releasing pension benefits. The court took a different position after reviewing the employee’s service history.

The judges noted that the employee had continuously served the government. His service was later regularised, which became important in the court’s decision.

The court held that continuous contractual service cannot simply be ignored. The period may count toward pension when the employee is later regularised.

However, the ruling does not automatically cover every contractual worker. Individual service records and applicable pension rules remain important.

The court stressed that the word “contract” alone cannot remove lawful Pension Rights. Authorities must examine the nature and continuity of the employee’s service.

Government policies and appointment conditions also cannot automatically override legal pension entitlements. Such conditions must remain consistent with applicable laws and rules.

In the case, the widow was seeking financial benefits after her husband’s death. The court ordered the release of pension and gratuity after considering his continuous service.

The Lahore High Court also referred to a legal principle established by the Supreme Court. Under certain circumstances, contractual employment can fall within temporary government service.

The court said authorities must look beyond the employment label. The continuity and later status of the employee should also be considered.

The judgment could have wider implications across Punjab. Many government workers spend years on contracts before receiving regular appointments.

Employees whose contractual service was previously excluded may find stronger legal grounds. They could challenge pension decisions based on similar circumstances.

The ruling may also affect how departments calculate qualifying service. Accounts offices may need to review cases involving regularised employees.

The decision could be especially important for families of deceased government workers. Pension claims can become difficult when qualifying service is calculated narrowly.

The judgment provides clarification on Pension Rights where contractual service preceded regularisation. However, each case will still depend on its specific facts.

Employees will need to consider their service records and applicable pension laws. Regularisation alone may not guarantee pension benefits in every case.

The ruling nevertheless strengthens the legal position of eligible employees. It also highlights the importance of counting continuous government service where the law permits it.

Government departments and pension authorities will now need to carefully assess similar cases. The decision could influence future disputes involving contractual service and pension eligibility.

In other news read more about: E-pension Portal Simplifies Pension Services For Govt Employees