Loading weather…
Breaking News

Macron To Present Scientific Evidence In US Court On Brigitte

Macron to Present Scientific Evidence in US Court on Brigitte

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, plan to present scientific evidence in a US court. Their lawyer confirmed the step is part of a defamation case against American commentator Candace Owens.

The couple will provide photographic and medical records to prove that Brigitte Macron is a woman. The evidence will be used in court filings to counter claims made by Owens on social media. The Macrons’ legal team stressed that the accusations are false and damaging.

The case began after Owens promoted conspiracy theories suggesting Brigitte Macron was born male. These remarks quickly gained traction online and were shared by her followers. Brigitte Macron has repeatedly denied the claims, calling them offensive and untrue.

The Macrons decided to take legal action in the United States, where Owens is based. Their lawyer explained that the scientific evidence aims to settle the matter conclusively. The couple sees the case as necessary to protect Brigitte’s reputation from ongoing online attacks.

Owens’ legal team has responded by filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. They argue that the case should not proceed in its current form. The court will now decide whether to move forward with a full hearing or drop the claim.

Legal experts say the Macrons’ decision to present scientific evidence in court is unusual but strategic. Such documentation could help strengthen their defamation claim by directly disproving the allegations.

The lawsuit highlights how misinformation spreads quickly in the digital era. Conspiracy theories about public figures often gain attention online, regardless of their accuracy. By going to court, the Macrons hope to set a legal precedent that protects individuals from such false narratives.

This case has drawn international attention because it involves both a sitting French president and a high-profile US media personality. It also raises broader questions about online accountability and the limits of free speech in defamation cases.

The focus keyword, scientific evidence, has become central to the case. The Macrons’ lawyer insists the court will receive full documentation. Meanwhile, Owens maintains her defense and awaits the court’s ruling on her motion to dismiss.

For now, the legal battle continues, and the outcome could have lasting implications. If the case proceeds, it may set an example of how public figures fight back against viral misinformation.

Discover how Huawei unveils breakthrough tech in computing to power China’s AI sector : Huawei unveils new computing tech to power China’s AI

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp

Ayesha Qurrat

News Writer

Trending

Latest